When we talk to people who insist strongly--
“I was taught and I will always believe that marriage
is between a man and a woman,
Try responding like Senator Haugen of the State of Washington did recently.
When we talk to people who insist strongly--
“I was taught and I will always believe that marriage
is between a man and a woman,
Try responding like Senator Haugen of the State of Washington did recently.
A Coalition of many Gay-Support groups, national as well as state, have pooled their resources in order to DEFEAT the Anti-Gay Amendment. Go to http://www.ProtectNCfamilies.org. The coordinated campaign will kick off in Mid-January with a launch event in Raleigh and with house parties throughout the state. The website will tell you WHAT YOU CAN DO!
_____________________________________________________________
January 11, 2012
On the eve of the first ever congressional hearing on proposals to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the White House on Tuesday announced President Barack Obama’s endorsement of the Respect For Marriage Act — the bill that would repeal DOMA.
White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters at Tuesday’s briefing that the president “is proud” to support the Respect For Marriage Act, “which would take the Defense of Marriage Act off the books for once and for all.”
The Respect for Marriage Act, introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would repeal DOMA and restore the rights of all lawfully married couples, including same-sex couples, to receive the benefits of marriage under federal law.
Advocates of the repeal hailed the White House announcement.
“It is rare that a White House endorses a bill that has yet to pass first in either the Senate or the House,” said Rick Jacobs, chairman of the gay rights advocacy group Courage Campaign, in a statement. “His support makes clear to all Americans that the Defense of Marriage Act has no place in our society.”
“By supporting this legislation, the President continues to demonstrate his commitment to ending federal discrimination against tens of thousands of lawfully married same-sex couples,” said HRC President Joe Solmonese, in a statement.
On January 11th, the Senate Judiciary Committee was scheduled to hear testimony about the marriage legislation.
The hearing, entitled “S.598, The Respect for Marriage Act: Assessing the Impact of DOMA on American Families,” marks the first ever hearing on the issue of repealing DOMA since its enactment nearly 15 years ago.
DOMA, enacted in 1996, prevents any of the over 1,100 federal rights, benefits and responsibilities of marriage from being afforded to legally married same-sex couples.
Those benefits include Social Security survivor benefits, federal employee health benefits for spouses, protections against spouses losing their homes in cases of severe medical emergencies, the right to sponsor a foreign born partner for immigration, the guarantee of family and medical leave and the ability to file joint tax returns, among many others.
see also “personal stories” blog.
Go to http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/My-Marriage-Is-Not-Threatened-By-Gay-Marriage-in-NC/210518079015149 where straight couples are signing that “My Marriage is not threatened by Gay Marriage.
Thousands have signed. Let’s put that silly myth to rest. Let’s work to defeat a constitutional amendment which Denies Rights. That’s not what constitutions are for!
National Pflag has issued the following statement regard-
ing the legislature’s approval of a May 2012 ballot
measure that will allow North Carolina residents to vote
on amending the state constitution to bar legal recogni-
tion of any union besides marriage between one man and one
woman, including civil unions and domestic partnerships for
LGBT and straight couples.
Jody Huckaby, Executive Director of the National Office of Pflag, said the following:“We at Pflag National are frustrated and furious that once again the legal rights of thousands of taxpaying citizens—this time in the beautiful state of North Carolina–will be put to a vote of the people.
That the legislature’s vote on this ballot measure was fast-tracked at the emotional expense of couples around the state and the financial expense of all North Carolinians, is even worse.
The fact is this: Discrimination in marriage equality is already the law of the land in North Carolina. To attempt to constitutionalize it in North Carolina is to make it even more of an official act that will sanction and perpetuate the denial of basic human rights and dignity to fellow humans.
Who will this constitutional amendment protect? Certainly not the thousands of families who live and work in the state who will have further rights stripped away from them, leaving them unprotected in matters of healthcare, estate planning, tax benefits and more. Certainly not businesses headquartered in the state, like our partner at Bank of America, Replacements, Ltd., Mitchell Gold-Bob Williams and other corportations which came out in strong opposition to this proposed amendment because they understand that discrimination in any form is bad for business.
And certainly not the State of North Carolina itself which, in the current economy and the wake of the destruction by Hurricane Irene, needs revenue pouring in, not resources draining as these same corporations, which have a long-standing commitment to equality and oppose discrimination in all forms, are perhaps compelled to leave the state.”
(This story is from the Human Rights Campaign)
Making the Connection Between Equality and Mental Health
![]() |
The American Psychological Association (APA), the world’s largest organization of psychologists, voiced its strong support for marriage equality this month. The support came in the form of a resolution passed unanimously (157-0) by the APA’s Council of Representatives, its primary policy making body.
The resolution notes that “the denial of civil marriage, including the creation of legal statuses such as civil unions and domestic partnerships, stigmatizes same-sex relationships… and reinforces prejudice against lesbian, gay, and bisexual people,” and calls for state and federal laws providing full marriage equality to same-sex couples.
Steve Simon, Member of the House of Representatives in Minnesota, asked his colleagues “How Many Gays Must God Create Before We Accept that He Wants Them Around?”
Arguing against an amendment to the Minnesota state constitution, he asks first “Is Sexual Orientation Innate? Think About It.” Then he says he thinks it is …..and more.
His brief comments are circulating on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXpOA3jPC04. Go there.